Showing posts with label open prompt revision. Show all posts
Showing posts with label open prompt revision. Show all posts

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Re'bird'thed


1984. Select a line or so of poetry, or a moment or scene in a novel, epic poem, or play that you find especially memorable. Write an essay in which you identify the line or the passage, explain its relationship to the work in which it is found, and analyze the reasons for its effectiveness.


            Speaking from experience, it is incredibly easy to forget things. Names, faces, birthdays, mathematical formulas, atomic numbers, phone numbers, and appointment times all slip easily through the cracks in the human mind. In order for something to be memorable, it needs to hold emotional weight or personal relevance; the brain doesn’t hold on to details that the subconscious finds unimportant. Storage space is limited, so when a line from a work sticks in deeply, it must be highly relevant. Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet has worked its way into the collective consciousness of Western culture, but the lines exchanged between the two lovers as Romeo departs after wooing Juliet on her balcony are especially memorable because they serve not only to characterize the pair, but also to heavily foreshadow their fate.
            The average person could probably recite ‘parting is such sweet sorrow,’ but in this case, the lines directly preceding it are far more notable:
ROMEO: I would I were thy bird
JULIET:             Sweet, so would I.
Yet I should kill thee with much cherishing.
They are exchanged at an emotionally loaded moment. Juliet and Romeo have just declared their love, and since Juliet is constantly interrupted and fluttering to and from the conversation, their farewell is extended for quite some time.  Romeo’s tendency to variance and mood swings has already been established by the time this scene arrives, but it is still an instrumental indicator that he is far too headstrong for his own good. Having met and kissed Juliet only once previously, he sneaks onto the grounds of his family’s sworn enemy and proposes to marry her, which is enough proof on its own. The way he does it also contributes to the image- for example, swearing his love on the moon which (as Juliet is quick to point out) is ever changing, and often used as an excuse for reckless and crazy behavior. He shows a slavish devotion to Juliet, throwing himself totally at her feet and wishing to be her pet bird, completely on her string and ruled by her entirely. The balcony scene shows Romeo for what he is- a young boy who is completely ruled by his emotions. He is willing to be governed, not only by his own whims, but by those of his lady-love, coming at her call and vowing to stay until she dismisses him.
Juliet, for her part, is established as the more practical one, demanding that Romeo ‘swear not by the moon’ and worrying that she will seem too forward and make him lose interest her. She is also the one, in the end, to suggest he marry her if his love is true and faithful- ensuring her own security. Sadly, she falls to Romeo’s charms and converts to his whimsy, her initial fears transforming to a proposal of marriage and the same verbose adulation that Romeo uses so often. Juliet’s practicality can partially be attributed to the location of this exchange. If she were caught with a man in her room at night un-chaperoned, the consequences for her would be devastating. While Romeo is unbothered by the risk, Juliet does much to conceal him, and worries than Romeo thought it through in the first place. It is she, after all, who delivers the death stroke of foreshadowing “I should kill thee with much cherishing.” With that line alone, she reveals her own introspective abilities, and a clearer eye to the future than Romeo.
 The phrase ‘kill thee with much cherishing’ is a massive clue that everything will not go smoothly for our star-crossed lovers. It is grim language for a thirteen-year-old girl, and it also proves that Juliet is highly cognizant of her own nature. Having just agreed to marry him, Juliet suddenly expresses fear that she would love Romeo too much, as a spoiled child loves its pet bird, that she would kill him because of it. They are her parting words to him- a warning- that her emotions will come to be too strong, and destroy him. Romeo answers with a wish for her to sleep and be at peace, which is eerily reminiscent of their ultimate fate when Juliet’s fake sleep takes on the appearance of death (or, eternal peace) and leads him to his death- another sentiment expressed in this grim farewell.
            Of course, from the beginning of the narrator’s introduction to ‘fair Verona’ the audience knows the fate of Romeo and Juliet, but there are still clues sprinkled throughout the play that the pair is doomed. Without those intermittent hints, the play would not have survived as a piece of literature, because it would have bored audiences to tears. A fated death is tragic, but one in which the reasons are evident earns the interest, and therefore the memory of the audience. While Shakespeare could have left all of the explanation and subtle reasoning out of his play and attributed it all to fate, he was wise enough to see that clever characterization and beautiful language would also be necessary to make not only the balcony scene, but Romeo and Juliet as a whole, worthy of remembrance.


Sunday, January 20, 2013

More matter, with less art

 (original)

1980. A recurring theme in literature is the classic war between a passion and responsibility. For instance, a personal cause, a love, a desire for revenge, a determination to redress a wrong, or some other emotion or drive may conflict with moral duty. Choose a literary work in which a character confronts the demands of a private passion that conflicts with his or her responsibilities. In a well-written essay show clearly the nature of the conflict, its effects upon the character, and its significance to the work.



             Living in sin is an outdated concept to those of us living in the present, but back in the days of corsets and feathered bonnets, the idea of living as man and wife without being actually married was shocking to say the least. To a young girl raised from birth to be devoted to the Christian faith and doctrine, the very idea would be synonymous with degradation and an assurance of hell in the afterlife. To a young girl hearing this proposal from a broken man who needs her, who also represents the only chance she has at bettering her life, the idea is far more tempting. This very scenario, the choice to throw her principles away for love or to cling to them and suffer, is presented to Jane Eyre on the very day she was meant to be married, and the choice she makes defines her character and sets the moral tone of the novel that shares her name.
            Jane’s true choice is not between purity and ruin; more accurately it is the choice between her duty to herself and her duty towards Rochester. From their first conversation, in which they debate about salvation, Jane is established as Rochester’s moral compass. Her true worry when she leaves him is that he will collapse into hedonism and damn him. However, Jane still chooses to go, largely due to the philosophy she learned from Helen Burns in her childhood—that as destitute and alone as she may become, her first responsibility is to her soul. In the end, her decision to leave is her recognition of her own value to herself. Regardless of how much she loves Rochester, she realizes that she cannot be responsible for both him and herself.
Jane would not be Jane if she bent ‘the laws given by God and sanctioned by Man’ to her own desires, but that does not mean that it didn’t cause her pain to leave Rochester. Her decision also ruined any chance of gaining a second employment—she was stranded without home, income, or reference of character in an uncaring and mistrusting society. She reaches the brink of starvation, but that is where the harmful effects begin to reverse themselves. Because she leaves Rochester’s employment at the same time she ends her engagement with him, Jane is given the chance to become her own woman, and discover her own merit. Although she misses him, she constantly affirms that she would rather be free and lonely than to be a slave to love. In choosing to leave Jane proves her worth; in her time away she proves her capability.
            Jane’s happiness at the end of the work is the true indicator of the moral nature of Jane Eyre. It affirms that those who make the right choices will be rewarded. Had Jane chosen the path that Rochester wanted, she would have become subservient and morally compromised. Her happiness would have been superficial and it would have evaporated quickly. Instead, she made her own way into her own life and job, and came back as an independent woman and an equal contributor to her own marriage. Not only did she maintain her responsibility to herself as a human being, she was made aware of her ability to care for Rochester. Jane’s choices are indicative of her strength as a character, and her choice to leave Rochester turns the entire book into an argument about willpower, morality, and marriage in an era where those concepts were seemingly set in stone.
            The events in Jane Eyre are carefully structured so that any given good thing couldn’t possibly have happened if a bad thing hadn’t happened first. Had Jane never left Thornfield, she would never have met her cousins on good terms. Had Jane never left Thornfield, as a matter of fact, she would have been burnt in her bed by Bertha Mason, a punishment reminiscent of hellfire for a woman who made the wrong choice even by her own moral code. Jane gains far more than she loses from her choice to remain true to herself, but her struggles with herself along the way prevent the novel from being too preachy.